• 09 Jun 2017 7:51 PM | John Heap (Administrator)

    Many nations have realised that the only true long-term key to economic growth is productivity improvement.


    The problem is that this realisation is often the end, rather than the start, of the matter.  Governments and their agencies exhort commerce - and perhaps even the population - to improve productivity and to compete - but without understanding their role in making this happen.


    Exhortation and hectoring are not enough.  Governments need to provide infrastructure, skills, information and advice - in ways that are accessible - just in time, at just the right level - and at the right cost!


    Its not rocket science - but it isn't easy either!


  • 02 Jun 2017 11:39 AM | John Heap (Administrator)

    I've referred to the subject (threat?) of robots several times in the last year (includinglast week).  Clearly they are going to have a big impact on many companies and on many people's jobs   - but exactly how, in what ways ,is not yet clear. For some time humans and robots are likely to be co-workers. Skilled workers will survive the longest.


    Views on this subject vary - but sometimes writers seem to be scaremongering rather than making reasoned assumptions and predictions.


    As ever, we will have to wait and see.


    However, my reading in this area did throw up a word I wish I had coined robopocalypse.



  • 26 May 2017 11:06 AM | John Heap (Administrator)

    The last 2 decades have sen the inexorable rise of the robot - especially in motor manufacture.  We have all seen the robotic arms lifting and fitting panels, spray painting, and so on.  Some workers have presumablybeen displaced  - but the economic gains have been substantial, surely.


    Well, this rise of †he robot has been matched with the lowest productivity growth in recorded times.


    Coincidence or causal relationship?


    Well, there is some evidence that those displaced workers have had to take low paid, possibly part-time work - not the high skill jobs that were predicted.  And, worse - some could find no alternative work at all - the jobs are in the wrong place!


    So, the rise of the robot might be good only for those who make and sell robots.  Or perhaps it simply takes time for society to adapt to such a massive change.


  • 19 May 2017 6:05 PM | John Heap (Administrator)

    Global rating agency Moody's Investors Service sees a persistent decline in labour productivity growth, stemming from an ageing population and slow investments, as posing a key threat to global economic recovery.


    The agency's report, titled "Collapse of Global Productivity Growth Remains Sizable Risk to Credit Conditions," published last week said global labour productivity growth fell to an average 1.7% in the post global financial crisis years of 2011-2015, compared to an average 2.6% between 1995-2007, Moody's.com reported.


    In 2016 alone, labour productivity growth slowed to just 1.2%. Moody's said if productivity growth remains unchanged, global economic growth next year might be as low as 2.5%, significantly lower than previous estimates of 3.5%.


    What are we doing about it?  What can we do about it?


  • 12 May 2017 1:44 PM | John Heap (Administrator)

    In the developing world, education standards have been rising for decades.  More and more of the population go to university and the number of degrees, and even higher degrees, rises relentlessly.


    Yet, still employers maintain - as they always have done - that they cannot get employees with the right skills.


    Note the word 'skills'.  Employers don't want more knowledge - that is easy to provide via Google - but skills are both expensive to provide -and take a long time to develop.


    This means that the 'education' system must become more of an 'education and skills' system and skills must receive parity of esteem with knowledge.


    In the UK, the proposed 'T levels' might help - but past initiatives have failed to change the 'esteem' with which skills are held. Teachers are knowledge-based - the wrong people to guide kids through a skills-based curriculum.  Changing this will take perhaps a couple of generations, helped by kids' increasing reluctance to take on the massive loans to fund university attendance.


    But, of course, employers must play their part - by reducing their reliance on the degree as a 'first sift' of job applicants -and recognising skills where they exist.


  • 05 May 2017 6:53 PM | John Heap (Administrator)

    Japan has a highly automated industrial sector which has fuelled productivity growth over several years. However this efficient sector is only a part of the Japanese economy (though an important part) and the rest of the economy - and especially the services sector has a very poor track record - relying on long hours of hard work to get things done, rather than streamlined processes and procedures.


    Noe I know that most readers are not representatives of countries but entrepreneurs and business men.  Well, the lesson for you is that you need to make improvements where they have maximum impact, not where they are easiest to make.


  • 28 Apr 2017 11:14 AM | John Heap (Administrator)

    Donald Trump is hailing his tax cutting plans as 'radical' and likely to stimulate US growth.How will they affect US productivity?


    Well, the way in which productivity responds to trade measures is not clear ... but if corporations are paying less tax, they may spend more on capital infrastructure or on R&D - and both of those are generally beneficial to productivity.  However, they take time to show up in the figures - so don't expect short term productivity gains.  And with long-term investments, often something else (some short term effect or expediency) often intervenes.


    So, as ever, we wait and see.  We hope.  And if it all works our, we might have to hail Trump as a visionary.


  • 21 Apr 2017 9:08 AM | John Heap (Administrator)

    Is laziness helpful in making people more productive? Does it encourage them to seek less arduous ways of achieving the same output?


    Well, certainly the opposite is not true  Busyness is not a sign of high productivity. Too many people are busy but essentially unproductive - because they are either doing the wrong things or doing them in the wrong way.


    Think about people like maintenance engineers - ideally we want them either doing nothing or carrying out planned maintenance - we do not want them working on breakdowns and emergencies.


    So, perhaps we should encourage people to create more 'idle time' as a reward for improving how they carry out their own tasks



  • 14 Apr 2017 6:41 PM | John Heap (Administrator)

    The head of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, has issued a stark warning that living standards will fall around the world unless governments take urgent action to increase productivity by investing in education, cutting red tape and incentivising research and development.

     

    Whether or not, you agree that her prescription is what is needed to improve productivity - or is complete, it is good that someone so influential is spreading the message about the need for productivity development. 


    I actually think she has got it mostly right - I would add infrastructure development, and would add training to education ... but her summary is pretty effective.


  • 07 Apr 2017 7:00 AM | John Heap (Administrator)


    I am just returning from the Wold Productivity Congress - an interesting and rewarding event.The  programme was too rich and varied to be summarised here but the spirit of the even† is captured by the Congress Declaration which is reproduced here.


    Declaration - Bahrain 2017


    We, the members of the global productivity movement, gathered in Bahrain for the World Productivity Congress from 1st to 4th April 2017 have been informed and inspired by three days of discussion, debate and deliberation on the Congress Theme of "New Roads to Innovation and Higher Productivity”. 


    This theme was in part inspired by the position of Bahrain (like other nations in the Gulf region) as needing to move to become a post-oil economy and needing to identify a range of routes towards economic growth. 


    As a result of our deliberations, we, the members of the global productivity community affirm the following principles underlining productivity development:


    • productivity development must be supported by innovative thinking and technological development, which in turn need the establishment of a supportive innovation ecosystem;
    • at the national level, productivity development is supported by the creation of healthy communities (of engaged, empowered and participating citizens
    • though the overall concepts and philosophy of productivity science remain globally applicable, specific productivity campaigns, approaches, tools and techniques must be applied in ways which are informed by local history and culture;
    • at the organisational level, productivity improvement is supported by an informed, engaged workforce, members of which have their knowledge and skills regularly reviewed and refreshed.


    We pledge our individual and collective commitment to:


    spreading awareness of these principles to key policy and decision-makers.


    ensuring that national and regional productivity development policy and practice is informed by the above principles


    We thank the country of Bahrain for creating a rich and rewarding event which led to the formation of these principles and we thank His Highness Shaikh Mohamed bi Mubarak Al Khalifa, Deputy Prime Minister of Bahrain, for his guidance and leadership as patron of the Congress.






Contact us

Address: 3rd Floor, Telegraph House,  80 Cleethorpe Road, Grimsby, DN31 3EF 

Phone:    +44 1472 358195

Email:     Info@instituteofproductivity.com

                     Privacy Policy

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software